“EQUITY” OR “BUSINESS FUNDING” – NAVIGATING THE LEGAL SUBSTANCE
As we embrace the Year of the Fire Horse 2026, a season of speed and strategic growth, many investors are moving forward with the spirit of “Hope for the best.” At THE LAM LAW LLC – Your legal need, Our Mission, we advocate for a balanced perspective: “Prepare for the worst” by ensuring your legal foundations are unassailable.
Precedent No. 78/2025/AL, adopted by the Supreme People’s Court, serves as a critical case study on the “Substance over Form” principle in corporate disputes.
⚖️ THE LEGAL COMPASS: EQUITY VS. BUSINESS COOPERATION
The core of this Precedent centers on whether a contribution creates a Member status or merely a Contractual relationship.
🔹The Burden of Liability: True equity contribution (Charter Capital) requires the member to be liable for company debts and obligations within the scope of that capital. If an agreement focuses only on profit-sharing without mentioning debt liability, it may be viewed as business funding rather than equity.
🔹The Exercise of Governance: A key indicator is whether the investor participates in the Members’ Council or influences business strategies. In this case, the investor’s lack of management involvement was a decisive factor in denying member status.
🔹The Final Barrier – Registration: While internal minutes (such as a 2017 meeting record) might acknowledge a contribution, the failure to update the Certificate of Enterprise Registration (ERC) or the Member Register leaves the investor’s status legally vulnerable.
🛠️ STRATEGIC SAFEGUARDS FOR 2026
To avoid the “silent partner” trap highlighted in this case, THE LAM LAW LLC – Your legal need, Our Mission recommends:
1. Precise Legal Instrumenting: Ensure your investment agreement explicitly states whether the funds are intended to increase “Charter Capital” or are for “Business Cooperation”.
2. Audit Your Internal Records: Confirm that your name appears in the Member Register and the Company Charter.
3. Strict Statutory Compliance: Promptly execute procedures with the Department of Planning and Investment (DPI) to reflect capital changes on the ERC.
“In the Year of the Fire Horse, momentum is key—but a solid legal anchor is what prevents a drift into litigation.”
📍 Reference Source: Precedent No. 78/2025/AL on determining the purpose of capital contribution to a company
———–
THE LAM LAW LLC
🏢Indochina Park Tower, # 4 Nguyen Dinh Chieu Str, Tan Dinh Ward, Ho Chi Minh City.
📞Tel: +84 (0)28 710 58 222 – 6288 3798 – Hotline: +84 (0) 973 097 777
✉ Email: info@thelamlawllc.com

Tiếng Việt
Related Posts
Is your Arbitral Award ready for enforcement under Vietnam’s new law on civil judgment enforcement?
❓ Can a favorable arbitral award truly protect your rights if it cannot be effectively
Jul
The Training Day – Digital Transformation In Case Management
As part of THE LAM LAW’s ongoing internal training and knowledge-sharing series, our lawyers and
Jul
Vietnam Ministry of Justice Clarifies Transactions Involving Mortgaged Assets
📢 On 1 July 2026, the Ministry of Justice of Vietnam issued Official Letter No.
Jul
The Training Day – Capital Contribution by Intellectual Property Rights
Continuing our series of internal knowledge-sharing sessions, the lawyers and associates of THE LAM LAW
Jul
New Resolution on the jurisdiction of vietnam’s courts in Arbitration, Bankruptcy and Intellectual Property matters
❓ Which courts in Vietnam will have jurisdiction over arbitration-related matters, bankruptcy proceedings, and intellectual
Jun
Case Precedent No. 83/2026/Al: Can An Insurer Refuse To Pay Simply Because The Wrongdoer Has Not Yet Been Identified?
In the insurance industry, disputes often arise not because a loss has not occurred, but
Jun