❓ Does the existence of an arbitration clause automatically exclude court jurisdiction?
In a recent appellate judgment concerning a credit and mortgage dispute between VPBank and individual borrowers, with the involvement of Novareal JSC, the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Court clarified the legal scope and effect of arbitration agreements in multi-party transactions. THE LAM LAW LLC – Your legal need, Our Mission would like to share as follows:
🧾 Case Overview
🔹The bank granted credit to the borrowers, secured by mortgage arrangements linked to a real estate project.
🔹An arbitration agreement existed between the bank and the project developer, but not with the borrowers.
🔹The first-instance judgment was set aside in its entirety, and the case was remanded due to serious procedural violations.
🔍 Key Legal Reasoning of the Court
1. Arbitration agreements have relative effect
The Court reaffirmed a fundamental principle:
🔹An arbitration agreement binds only the parties who have expressly consented to it.
🔹As the borrowers were not signatories to the arbitration agreement, there was no legal basis to compel arbitration or exclude court jurisdiction.
2. No implied extension to non-signatories
The Court rejected arguments that arbitration should apply merely because related transactions:
🔹Were connected to the same project; and
🔹Included an arbitration clause in one agreement.
📌 Arbitration agreements cannot be presumed or extended by implication, even in closely connected commercial structures.
3. Jurisdiction based on the nature of the dispute
The Court focused on substance rather than form:
🔹The core dispute concerned repayment obligations under a credit agreement;
🔹Project-related arrangements were ancillary and did not alter jurisdiction.
📌 Key Takeaways
▪️ Arbitration clauses do not automatically exclude court jurisdiction where key parties are non-signatories.
▪️ In multi-party financing structures, dispute resolution clauses must be carefully aligned across all relevant agreements.
▪️ Vietnamese courts determine jurisdiction based on the legal nature of the dispute, not merely the transactional context.
📎 Reference – Appellate Judgment
THE LAM LAW LLC
🏢Indochina Park Tower, # 4 Nguyen Dinh Chieu Str, Tan Dinh Ward, Ho Chi Minh City.
📞Tel: +84 (0)28 710 58 222 – 6288 3798 – Hotline: +84 (0) 973 097 777
✉ Email: info@thelamlawllc.com

Tiếng Việt
Related Posts
Holiday Notice – Hung Kings’ Commemoration Day, Reunification Day & International Workers’ Day 2026
Dear Valued Clients and Partners, On the occasion of Hung Kings’ Commemoration Day, Reunification Day
Apr
Startup Pitch 2026 – Where Ideas Take Flight
It’s Yesterday, the Final Round of the “Startup Pitch – Gọi vốn khởi nghiệp 2026”,
Apr
The 37th International Residency & Overseas Investment Forum 2026
📍 Ho Chi Minh City | 14–16 April 2026THE LAM LAW LLC – Your legal
Apr
Talkshow Startup & Law: Legal Essentials for Entrepreneurs
It’s Friday 10th April, Mr. David Lam, our Managing Partner of THE LAM LAW LLC
Apr
Vietnam’s “Go Global” Program 2026–2030: A Strategic Legal Roadmap for Enterprises
On 06 April 2026, the Prime Minister issued Decision No. 626/QĐ-TTg, approving the “Program to
Apr
Global immigration & Investment industry elite Convention 2026
In an era where capital, talent, and opportunities move across borders faster than ever, the
Apr